<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dúvidas de fotografia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ruimoura.net/blog/2006/08/25/duvidas-de-fotografia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ruimoura.net/blog/2006/08/25/duvidas-de-fotografia/</link>
	<description>FREE, AS IN FREEDOM OF CHOICE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tiago Farrajota</title>
		<link>http://ruimoura.net/blog/2006/08/25/duvidas-de-fotografia/comment-page-1/#comment-3341</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiago Farrajota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruimoura.net/blog/2006/08/25/duvidas-de-fotografia/#comment-3341</guid>
		<description>não é só o corpo em plástico, o próprio vidro é de qualidade diferente.. 
exemplo com as objectivas referidas em cima:

Sigma 18-50 f/3.5-5.6 (Lens Construction: 8 Elements in 8 Groups)
» http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3286&amp;navigator=6

Sigma EX 18-50 f/2.8 (Lens Construction: 15 Elements in 13 Groups)
» http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3285&amp;navigator=6

vê a parte da &quot;Lens Construction&quot;, a f/2.8, sendo EX tem mais vidro e de melhor qualidade: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;A Special Low Dispersion (SLD) glass lens element provides effective compensation for lateral chromatic aberration, which is likely to occur with digital SLR cameras. The use of two aspherical lens elements provides correction for various aberrations and makes high quality images a reality throughout the entire zoom range.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>não é só o corpo em plástico, o próprio vidro é de qualidade diferente..<br />
exemplo com as objectivas referidas em cima:</p>
<p>Sigma 18-50 f/3.5-5.6 (Lens Construction: 8 Elements in 8 Groups)<br />
» <a href="http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3286&amp;navigator=6" rel="nofollow">http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3286&amp;navigator=6</a></p>
<p>Sigma EX 18-50 f/2.8 (Lens Construction: 15 Elements in 13 Groups)<br />
» <a href="http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3285&amp;navigator=6" rel="nofollow">http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3285&amp;navigator=6</a></p>
<p>vê a parte da &#8220;Lens Construction&#8221;, a f/2.8, sendo EX tem mais vidro e de melhor qualidade: </p>
<blockquote><p>A Special Low Dispersion (SLD) glass lens element provides effective compensation for lateral chromatic aberration, which is likely to occur with digital SLR cameras. The use of two aspherical lens elements provides correction for various aberrations and makes high quality images a reality throughout the entire zoom range.</p></blockquote>
<p> <img src='http://ruimoura.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boss</title>
		<link>http://ruimoura.net/blog/2006/08/25/duvidas-de-fotografia/comment-page-1/#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator>Boss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 09:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruimoura.net/blog/2006/08/25/duvidas-de-fotografia/#comment-3338</guid>
		<description>@Ricardo e Isa: estou a ver que a 400d já anda a brilhar nessas cabeças :)

@Tiago:de facto, essas lentes baratas pecam por causa do plástico. Não que a qualidade seja muito má, mas com o tempo ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ricardo e Isa: estou a ver que a 400d já anda a brilhar nessas cabeças <img src='http://ruimoura.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Tiago:de facto, essas lentes baratas pecam por causa do plástico. Não que a qualidade seja muito má, mas com o tempo &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricardo</title>
		<link>http://ruimoura.net/blog/2006/08/25/duvidas-de-fotografia/comment-page-1/#comment-3337</link>
		<dc:creator>ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruimoura.net/blog/2006/08/25/duvidas-de-fotografia/#comment-3337</guid>
		<description>Prepara a carta para o &lt;i&gt;Pai Natal&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prepara a carta para o <i>Pai Natal</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isa</title>
		<link>http://ruimoura.net/blog/2006/08/25/duvidas-de-fotografia/comment-page-1/#comment-3336</link>
		<dc:creator>Isa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruimoura.net/blog/2006/08/25/duvidas-de-fotografia/#comment-3336</guid>
		<description>Many thanks, ricardo! Tá mais barata que eu tava à espera hi hi hi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks, ricardo! Tá mais barata que eu tava à espera hi hi hi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricardo</title>
		<link>http://ruimoura.net/blog/2006/08/25/duvidas-de-fotografia/comment-page-1/#comment-3335</link>
		<dc:creator>ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruimoura.net/blog/2006/08/25/duvidas-de-fotografia/#comment-3335</guid>
		<description>já há preços na net para a 400D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>já há preços na net para a 400D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
